Bachman, LF (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language testing, 17(1), 1-42.
Bennett, R.E., Braswell, J., Oranje, A., Sandene, B., Kaplan, B., Yan, F (2008). Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(9).
Berner, J. E (2003). A study of factors that may influence faculty in selected schools of education in the Commonwealth of Virginia to adopt computers in the classroom. George Mason University.
Boo, J (1997) Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of educational development: Score comparability and examinee preferences. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Iowa, USA.
Bridgeman, B., Lennon, M. L., & Jackenthal, A (2003). Effects of screen size, screen resolution and display rate on computer-based test performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 191-205.
Chapelle, C. A (2007). Technology and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 27: 98-114.
Clariana, R. and Wallace, P (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology. 33 (5) 593-602.
Coniam, D (2006). Evaluating computer-based and paper-based versions of an English-language listening test. ReCALL. 18: 193–211.
Cumming, A., R. Kantor, K. Baba, U. Erdosy & James M (2006). Analysis of discourse features and verification of scoring levels for independent and integrated prototype written tasks for next generation TOEFL (TOEFL Monograph 30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
DeAngelis, S (2000). Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing. Journal of Allied Health, 29, 161-164.
DeBell, M. & Chapman, C (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001: Statistical Analysis Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Douglas, D., Hegelheimer, V (2007). Assessing language using computer technology. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2007, 27: 115–132.
Fleming, S. & Hiple, D (2004). Foreign language distance education at the University of Hawai'i. In C. A. Spreen, (Ed.), New technologies and language learning: issues and options (Technical Report #25) (pp. 13-54). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Higgins, J., Russell, M., & Hoffmann, T (2005). Examining the effect of computer-based passage presentation on reading test performance. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(4). Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/
Horkay, N., Bennett, R. E., Allen, N., & Kaplan, B (2005). Online assessment in writing. In B. Sandene, N. Horkay, R. E. Bennett, N. Allen, J. Braswell, B. Kaplan, & A. Oranje (Eds.), Online assessment in mathematics and writing: Reports from the NAEP Technology-Based Assessment Project (NCES 2005-457). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Isleem, M (2003). Relationships of selected factors and the level of computer use for instructional purposes by technology education teachers in Ohio public schools: a statewide survey. The Ohio State University.
Jamieson, J. M (2005).Trends in computer-based second language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2005, 25: 228–242.
Kathleen Scalise and Bernard Gifford, (2006). Computer-Based Assessment in E-Learning: A Framework for Constructing "Intermediate Constraint" Questions and Tasks for Technology Platforms(Volume 4, Number 6).
Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & William, D (2005). Classroom assessment minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19-24.
Laborda, J (2007). On the Net Introducing Standardized EFL/ESL Exams. Journal of LLT, 11, 39.
Leeson, H (2006). The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerised Testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(1), pp.1-24.
Mason, B. J., Patry, M., & Bernstein, D. J (2001). An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing. Journal of Educational computing research. 24, 29-39.
Mazzeo, J. Druesne, B., Raffeld, P., Checketts, K. & Muhlstein, A (1991). Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations. (College Board Report 91-5). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
Pommerich, M (2004). Developing computerized versions of paper-and-pencil tests: Mode effects for passage-based tests. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(6).
Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D.F (2002). The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 337-354.
Pomplun, M., & Custer, M (2005). The score comparability of computerized and paper-and-pencil formats for K-3 reading tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 153-166.
Pomplun M., Ritchie, T., & Custer M (2006). Factors in paper-and-pencil and computer reading score differences at the primary grades. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 127-143.
Rezaee, A.A., Zainol Abidin, M. J., Issa, J. H., Mustafa, P. O (2012). TESOL in-Service Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computer Use. English Language Teaching. Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 61-68.
Roussos, P (2007). The Greek computer attitudes scale: construction and assessment of psychometric properties.Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 578-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.027.
Sadik, A (2006). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Attitudes toward Personal use and school Use of Computers New Evidence From A Developing Nation. Education Review, 30(1), 86-113.
Salimi, H., Rashidy, A., Salimi, A. H., Amini Farsani, M (2011). Digitized and non-Digitized Language Assessment: A Comparative Study of Iranian EFL Language Learners. International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics IPEDR vol.26. IACSIT Press, Singapore.
Schaeffer, G., Reese, C., Steffen, M. McKinley, R. & Mills, C. (1993). Field Test of a Computer-Based GRE General Test. Reports-Research/Technical ETS-RR-93-07.
Taylor, C., Kirsch, I., Eignor, D., Jamieson, J (1999). Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks. Language Learning, 49(2), pp.219-274.
Wang, S (2004). Online or paper: does delivery affect results? Administration mode comparability study for Stanford Diagnostic Reading and Mathematics Tests. Harcourt Assessment Inc, USA.
Yurdabakan, I (2012). Primary School Students' Atitudes Towards Computer Basedtesting and Assessment in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education- Volume: 13 Number: 3 Article 12.
Zhang, L, & Lau, C.A (2006, April). A comparison study of testing mode using multiple-choice and constructed-response items – Lessons learned from a pilot study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, San Francisco, CA.