Document Type : Original Article


Islamic Azad University, Shahre-Kord Branch, Iran


This study aimed at examining whether co-teaching strategy could maximize EFL students' reading comprehension more than the traditional single person teaching. To fulfill the study, 90 female students were selected from among 120 students of intermediate EFL learners already passed level five at two private language institutes in Shahre-Kord. They were all female, between seventeen to twenty in age. Three experienced female teachers took part in the study. After administering the Nelson Proficiency Test, 60 students whose score range fell one standard deviation above and below the mean were selected and divided into a control group and an experimental group. In the treatment part, reading comprehension section was implemented by one teacher for the control group while for the experimental group, teaching reading section was done by two teachers. Finally, a post-test on reading comprehension was conducted for both groups, and a t-test analysis was conducted to see whether the treatment was significant or not. The findings of the study revealed that there was a significant difference between the control and the experimental group in terms of their reading improvement and that experimental group outperformed the control group.


Aliakbari, M., & Mansoori, N (2010).Implementing a co-teaching model for improving EFL learners, grammatical proficiency. Ict for language learning 3rd edition.
Andrews, K., & Wooten, B (2005).Closing the gap: helping students identify the skills employers want. NACE Journal, 64(4), 41–44.
Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., &Friend, M (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 17–22
Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J.J (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students. Austin, TX: PRO-E
Brown, H.D (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy, 2nd ed. California: San Francisco State University.
Cook, L., & Friend, M (1995). Co teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1–16.
Dieker, L.A (2001). What are the characteristics of “effective” middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities? Preventing School Failure, 46(1), 14–23.
Fennick, E (2001). Co teaching: An inclusive curriculum for transition. Teaching
ExceptionalChildren, 33, 60–67.
Fennick, E., & Liddy, D (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching: Co-teachers’ perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 229–240.
Friend, M., & Cook, L (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4thed.). New York: Longman
Friend, M., & Cook, L (2004). Co-Teaching: Principles, Practices and Pragmatics, Quarterly Special Education Meeting Albuquerque, NM
Hartenian, L. S., Schellenger, M., & Frederickson, P (2001).Creation and assessment of anintegrated business course. Journal of Education for Business, 76(3), 149–159.
Jang, S.J (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177–194.
Dahlberg, K., & Hoover, J (2003).The Effects of Co-Teaching on K6 Student Moote, S., 2003. Insights into team teaching. The English Teacher: An International Journal 6 (3), 328–334.
Maultsby, S. & Barbara, M (2009).A Descriptive analysis of the impact of co-teaching on the Reading/Language Arts and Math achievement of selected middle school students in a Middle Tennessee school district. Tennessee State University,169pages; AAT 3408564.
Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H.L (2001). A meta-analysis of co teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258–267.
Nunan, D (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Reith, H. J., & Polsgrove, L (1998).Curriculum and instructional issues in teaching secondary Students with learning disabilities. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Educating students with mild disabilities: Strategies and methods (pp. 255-274). Denver, CO: Love.
Rice, D., & Zigmond, N (2000).Co teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of Developments in Australian and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research &Practice, 15, 190–197.
Shapiro, E. J., & Dempsey, C.J (2008). Conflict resolution in team teaching: a case study in interdisciplinary teaching. College Teaching, 56(3), 157–162.
Sharon, V., Jeanne, S., & Maria, A (1997). The ABCDEs of Co-Teaching, Teaching Exceptional Children, 30 (2),4-1
Smith, B. N., Hornsby, J. S., & Kite, M (2000).Broadening the business curriculum via a cross-disciplinary approach: a mobile unit on cultural diversity. Education, 120(4), 713–722.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Arguelles, M.E (1997).The ABCDEs of co teaching. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 30(2), 1–10.
Villa, R., Thousand, J., & Nevin, A (2008). A guide to co-teaching: Practical tips for facilitating student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
Watkins, K. & Caffarella, R (1999).Team Teaching: Face –to-face and On-line. Presentation given at Commission of Professors of Adult Education meeting. An Antonio, TX
Wood, M (1998). Whose job is it anyway?
Educational roles in inclusion. Exceptional Children, 64, 181-195.
Zigmond, N., & Magiera, K (2001). A focus on co-teaching: Use caution. Current Practice Alerts, 5.Retrieved August 20, 2002, from