The Relationship between Memory and Language Learning

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Graduate of Persian Language and Literature, Imam Jafar Sadegh Campus, Ilam Sisters Unit, Iran

Abstract
The proposed study investigates the relationship between memory and students' language learning through thematic analysis. Library resources and related articles were utilized for this research. The results indicated that language learners with strong short-term visual and written memories have an excellent performance in learning vocabulary with appendices. Learners with strong visual short-term memory but poor verbal short-term memory and learners with poor visual short-term memory and verbal solid short-term memory also perform similarly. However, learners with poor visual and verbal short-term memory learn better without vocabulary. The results also demonstrated that the language texture leads to the impacts of particular encryption and language-related factors at the time of recall affect the accessibility of memory. It is essential to consider this point in the learning and testing of bilingual individuals to facilitate recall. In general, the results showed that strong memory in language learning has a direct relationship.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. D. Friederici, NChomsky, R.C. Berwick, A. Moro, J.J. Bolhuis, Nat. Hum. Behav., 2017 1, 713-722. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  2. Baddeley, J. Commun. Disord., 2003, 36, 189-208. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  3. Baddeley, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2003, 4, 829-839. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  4. Cowan, Behav. Brain Sci., 2001, 24, 87-114. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  5. Jonsdottir, A. Bouma, J.A. Sergeant, E.J. Scherder, Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 2005, 20, 443-456. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  6. G. Butler, K. Hakuta, Acad. Exch., 2006, 10, 23-27. [PDF], [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Willoughby, J. Social Psychol.1933, 4, 490. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  8. M. Hagen, Dutch Crossing1989, 13, 105-113. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sperling, Hum Factors, 1963, 5, 19-31 [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  10. Van Daal, L. Verhoeven, J. Van Leeuwe, H. Van Balkom, J. Commun. Disord., 2008, 41, 85-107 [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  11. Jonsdottir, A. Bouma, J.A. Sergeant, E.J. Scherder, Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., 2005, 20, 443-456 [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  12. Cowan, Behav. Brain Sci., 2001, 24, 87-114 [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  13. Jahangiri, H. Soleimani, M. Jafari Gohar, The Capacity of Working Memory and Learning Second Language Structures in an Implicit and Explicit Environment: The effect of the Type of Language Structure Article 5, 2017, 8, (37 consecutive) [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  14. Saed, R. Roshan, A.R. Moradi, Daneshvar Behav. Sci. Res. Monthly, 2016, 31, 22-30. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  15. Melby-Lervg, C. Hulme, Dev Psychol., 2013, 49, 270-291. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  16. Cowan, Behav. Brain Sci., 2001, 24, 87-114. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  17. Mokhtari, J. Law Political Stud., 2021, 1, 248-257. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  18. Momeni, F. Geravandi, A. khosravi, J. Law Political Stud., 2021, 1,-14. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  19. Hosseini, J. Law Political Stud., 2021, 1, 270-287. [crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  20.  
Volume 11, Issue 3
Summer 2022
Pages 168-180

  • Receive Date 31 January 2022
  • Revise Date 11 February 2022
  • Accept Date 13 February 2022