%0 Journal Article %T Damaging Due to Non-Contractual Fault or Unlawful Act %J International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science %I Sami Publishing Company %Z 2717-0209 %A Khosravi, Ahmad %A Mahdavi Rad, Asad %D 2022 %\ 09/01/2022 %V 11 %N 4 %P 251-256 %! Damaging Due to Non-Contractual Fault or Unlawful Act %K Civil Liability %K contractual liability %K Cercive liability %K Damage %R 10.22034/ijashss.2022.345367.1098 %X Civil liability has two branches as the contractual and non-contractual liability. If there is a contract between two or more parties and one of them commits a breach of contract (non-performance; delay in fulfilling the obligation) and the other party suffers damage, the contract’s violator has a contractual responsibility and should bear the damage. In some cases, where an individual inflicts damage on another without a contract between them, or if there is a contract, the loss is not related to the contract; there is talk of non-contractual liability. Civil liability in the law of obligations is a title to express the legal obligation to compensate for unlawful damages; whether it is a contract’s breach or a violation of the public duty of non-damages otherwise, civil liability has two significant branches from the contract. The purpose of liability is to compensate for unjust loss, which it is a loss argued in the theoretical foundations of liability, and its criteria are based on liability. Compensation for unlawful loss depends on the existence on conditions, among which is the condition of “predictability of loss” and mentioned in both contractual and coercive liability (non-contractual obligations). %U https://www.ijashss.com/article_153206_93878d51a112f2840fbe59f08e56c2f8.pdf