Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Geography Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad(FUM)

2 PhD Candidate of Urban Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad(FUM), International Campus, Faculty Member of Kheradgarayan Motahar Higher Education Institute

3 PhD Candidate of Urban Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad(FUM), International Campus

Abstract

Urban has been defined as an autonomous and complex system. Despite the overwhelming differences between urban growths around the world, their growth still follows some universal mechanisms. Darwin’s theory of evolution might have enlightened an innovative view to perform the research of urban development, as a consequence many researchers have been trying to link their research to the biological metaphor of urban evolution. In the context of an analogy to biology, urban can be seen as ‘organic’ and many concepts from biology can be borrowed to explain the ‘uncertainty’ and ‘relativity’ of urban growth processes. Urban DNA is one of the innovative concepts, which has been used to describe the unique characteristics of urban and the common fundamental elements of each urban area. As Hall (2008) stated “every city has its own DNA, something that makes it unique, and that's part of what makes this city unique”. The main ideas of applying the concept of urban DNA involve identifying the key factors/ metrics which reflect urban characteristics, therefore allowing the understanding the cities’ characteristics with urban DNA. This would allow, among other things, to identify or propose optimal urban form and allowing ‘smooth’ transition of growth patterns and the characteristics of urban from a suboptimal urban form. As Silva (2004) explained, the possibility of defining this ‘key’ (DNA) for each region seems to be of great significance in the planning studies. It allows for the understanding of how the different elements that constraint the functioning of urban system progress and constrain different regions, and what function they should have in shaping future scenarios. This research explores the theory aspects of urban DNA, and makes an attempt to link this concept with an integrated urban growth model (DG-ABC). The simulation results of a pilot study are analyzed in the context of the biology analogy in order to test the possibility of deriving urban DNA from DG-ABC model, by doing so we hope to understand how the key factors and parameters influence the formation of urban patterns, and therefore allowing making optimal solutions to urban growth problems.

Keywords

Ajzen, I. (1985).  From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11- 39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Batty, M , P. Longley., (1994).  Fractal cities. A Geometry of Form and Function, Academic Press, London.

Batty, M, Xie, Y.(1996).  Preliminary evidence for a theory of the fractal city. Environment and Planning A, 28(10):1745–1762.

Barthe´lemy, Marc and Flammini, Alessandro., (2008).  Modeling Urban Street Patterns, Physical review letters 100, 138702.

Caglioni, M. Pelizzoni, M. Rabino, G. A. (2006).  Urban sprawl: a case study for project gigalopolis using SLEUTH model. Lecture notes in computer science, 4173:436-445.

Clarke, K.C. (2008). Mapping and Modeling Land Use Change: an Application of the SLEUTH Model, in Landscape Analysis and Visualization: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning, (Eds. Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D. and Duncan, D.), Springer, Berlin, pp 353-366.

Franklin et al., (2002). Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems (4 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.  ISBN 0-13-032393-4.

Holland, John H., (1975).  Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

Hall, Jamie., (2008).  Future Greatness lies in link to North, The Edmonton Journal.  http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/features/goodgreat/story.html?id=a101a1d6- 2829-4f72-9631-41c3f82ac883.

Langton. C., (1986).  Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physical D, 22 (1986):120–149.

Marshall, S. (2007).  Urbanism in Evolution: New Urbanism and Beyond, available via: http://www.rudi.net/node/18165.

Nicholas, G. and Clarke, K. (2006).  Exploring the DNA of our Regions: classification of outputs from the SLEUTH model. ACRI 2006:462-471.

Openshaw, S., Openshaw., C. (1997).  Artificial intelligence in geography. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. USA.

Silva, Elisabete A. (2001).  The DNA of our regions. Artificial intelligence in regional planning. World Planning Schools Congress (paper 5019), Shanghai.

Silva, E. A., Clarke., K.C. (2002). Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto. Computer, Environment and urban systems, 26(6):525-552.

Silva, Elisabete A. (2004).  The DNA of our regions: artificial intelligence in regional planning. Futures, 36, (10):1077-1094.

Silva, Elisabete A. and Clarke, K. (2005).  Complexity, emergence and cellular urban models: lessons learned from Appling SLEUTH to two Portuguese cities. European Planning Studies,

13 (1):93-115.

Silva, Elisabete A. (2006).  Waves of Complexity: bifurcations or phase transitions, paper presented in IIIRD Meeting of AESOP thematic group on complexity, Cardiff, UK, May, 2006.

Webster, C. (1996).  Urban morphological fingerprints. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23:279–297.

Wilson, A. (2008). Urban and regional dynamics – 3: ‘DNA’ and ‘genes’ as a basis for constructing a typology of areas. CASA Working Paper 130. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis  (UCL), London, UK.