Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate and model psychological factors influencing learning approaches of agriculture students. A sample of 89 agricultural students from Tehran University (Iran) and 85 agricultural students from Flemish university (Belgium) participated in this study. Data were collected via a questionnaire and after that, descriptive and inferential statistics were applied for data analysis, using SPSS/v16.0. Our study revealed that both similarities and differences can be observed on the psychological characteristics of agricultural students in different cultural contexts. The findings showed that there were significant differences between the two groups (Iranian and Flemish students) on deep learning. So, the finding confirmed that learning approaches were context dependent. In this study, achievement motivation has been taken as a mediator between psychological factors and learning approaches in each cultural context. According to the findings in the Iranian and Flemish context, the most psychological dominant determinant for deep learning was self-efficacy beliefs and extroversion, respectively. For both groups, extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation had positive effects on surface learning and deep learning, respectively. Also, the two motivations showed negative effects on deep learning and surface learning, respectively. According to the findings, recommendations were put forth.

Keywords

Allik, J. (2005). Personality dimensions across cultures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(3), 212-232.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Benet-Martínez,V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cincograndes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitraitmultimethod analysis of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor SPQ: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.

Bodas, J., Ollendick, T.H. &Sovani, A.V. (2008) Test anxiety in Indian children: A cross-cultural perspective. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 21(4), 387–404.

Bong, M. &Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.

Burnett, P. C., & Proctor, R. M. (2002). Elementary school students’ learner self-concept, academic self-concepts and approaches to learning. Educational Psychology in Practice, 18, 325−333.

Case, J. M. & Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: procedural approaches to learning in engineering contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 605–615.

Cavallo, A. M. L., & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationships between students’ meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 393−418.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., &Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375−395.

Choosri, Ch. &Intharaksa, U. (2011). Relationship between Motivation and Students’ English Learning Achievement: A study of the Second – year vocational certificate level Hatyai Technical College Students. The 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences, April 2, 2011. Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University Proceedings- Factors Affecting English Language Teaching and Learning.

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.

Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of Goal pursuits: Humanneeds and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11(4), 227–268.

DeYoung, C.G., & Gray, J.R. (2009). Personality neuroscience: explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. In: P.J. Corr and G. Matthews (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press, 323–346.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 57-72.

French, S.L. (2010). Motivation for enrolling in school-based agricultural education expressed by Cafnr freshmen students. Unpublished Master thesis. Department of Agricultural Education, University of Missouri.

George, D. &Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Hancock, D. R. (2001). Effect of test anxiety and evaluative threats on students’ achievement and motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 284-290.

Hofer, J., Busch, H., Bender, M., Ming, L., &Hagemeyer, B. (2010). Arousal of Achievement Motivation among Student Samples in Three Different Cultural Contexts: Self and Social Standards of Evaluation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5-6) 758 –775.

Isen, A. M. & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 297-325.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: L. A. Pervin& O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.

Komarraju, M., &Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557−567.

Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, Ch.M.K. & Chen, Zh. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42, 1095–1104.

Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 567-582

Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of under achievement: Differential diagnosis and differential treatment. In I. B. Wiley (Series Ed.), Wiley series on personality processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Nyroos, M., Korhonen, J., Linnanmaki, K. &Svens-Liavåg, C. (2012). A cross-national comparison of test anxiety in Swedish and Finnish grade 3 pupils: Measured by the CTAS. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 615–636.

Oludipe, B. (2009). Influence of test anxiety on performance levels on numerical tasks of secondary school physics students. Academic Leadership: Online Journal, 7(4).

Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552-567.

Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.) Motivational Psychology of Human Development: Developing Motivation and Motivational Development, Advances in Psychology 131, (pp. 143–163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Pintrich, P.R., Smith D.A.F., Garcia, T. &McKeachie, W.J. (1991). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Rizwan, A.R. & Nasir, M. (2010). The relationship between test anxiety and academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research,32(2), 63- 74.

Ross, Sh. (2008). Motivation correlates of academic achievement: Exploring how motivation influences academic achievement in the PISA 2003 dataset. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria.

Saracaloglu, A.S. &Dinçer, I.B. (2009). A study on correlation between self-efficacy and academic motivation of prospective teachers. Paper presented at the World Conference Education Science, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(2009), 320–325.

Segall, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J.W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.

Simons, J., Dewitte, S. & Lens, w. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 343-360.

Sundstøl, F. (2004). Poverty Reduction Strategies and Relevant Participatory Learning Processes in Agricultural Higher Education. Ås: Agricultural University of Norway.

Swanberg, A.B. &Martinsen, Ø.L. (2010). Personality, approaches to learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 75–88.

Trumbull, E. &  Rothstein-Fisch, C. (2011).  The Intersection of Culture and Achievement Motivation.  The School Community Journal, 21(2), 25-53.

Weisberg, Y., DeYoung, C.G., & Hirsh, J.B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-11.

Woodrow, D. (2001). Cultural determination of curricula, theories and practices. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(1), 5-27.

Wren, D.G. & Benson, J. (2004) Measuring test anxiety in children: Scale development and internal construct validation. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 17(3), 227–240.

Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.

Zhu, C., Valcke, M. &Schellens, T. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences 18, 120-127.